Archive for August, 2009

Lending Club Note Trading Platform
Two fingers mean I'm trying to sell an overpriced note.

Two fingers mean I'm trying to sell an overpriced note.

I spent my Sunday searching for undervalued commodities, first in my fantasy football draft (I know – big dork), then on Lending Club’s Note Trading Platform.  The draft was hit or miss, and I’m sure I won’t know whether I hit or missed in most cases until later this season.  The Note Trading Platform was pretty barren.  I’d love to hear from someone who has had better luck finding something worth investing in there, because I honestly couldn’t find anything that I thought was even a mediocre investment opportunity.

Most of the people selling notes on the note trading platform are selling them for a specific reason.  For the most part, that reason seems to be because the borrower is behind on their payments.  Their credit score and the probability that they’ll repay has taken a plunge for whatever reason.  In some cases, the borrower is just late.  The investors want to sell these notes for an obvious reason – the notes are surrounded in uncertainty.  There’s really no way to know whether the borrower will continue to be late, continue to miss payments, or whether they’re going to turn it around and start meeting their obligations.

Of course, not every note is late or in the grace period.  Some of the notes are being paid back as promised, and as a corollary the lender’s credit profile has improved.  The problem with these notes is that they’re mispriced.  The investors selling them are trying to sell them for such a hefty premium that you’d think they were government insured obligations.  In some cases, the notes are priced so high that even if all the payments were made as scheduled, you’d be receiving a negative interest rate.  It’s hard to believe, but I guess there’s no way to understand what these people are thinking.  Maybe they actually don’t want to sell the notes, but would be willing to do so if they found someone who was willing to make a really nonsensical decision.  When I was a young kid, I used to collect baseball cards, and this is the type of trade I would make with my cousin who was 2 years younger than me (he rewarded me by making me his best man in his wedding, which is next week).  In any trade you make, you have to ask yourself the question, what do I know that the seller doesn’t know?  Do they know something that I don’t know?

In any case, I think there are some good investments on Lending Club if you invest in the original notes.  Until the Note Trading Platform becomes a more rational marketplace, I wouldn’t buy anything there.  If you find someone willing to buy your notes for the ridiculous markups and enormous risks associated with such a trade, well, enjoy your profits.  It won’t be me.  My recommendation is to avoid the trading platform.  If someone else has another view or has had some success on the Trading Platform I would love to hear what it is you do and how you do it.  I’ll be impatiently waiting for Lending Club’s (like Prosper’s) approval in Missouri.  Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , ,

No Comments


5 Things You Should Read

kennedybrothers

As I’m sure you know, Senator Ted Kennedy died earlier this week.  However you feel about his politics, it’s hard to dispute the impact the Kennedy’s have had on American politics.  It’s a family history that is rife with tragedy.  I have no desire to make this blog political.  I will say that I do have a special affection for the speech Robert Kennedy gave in Indianapolis the night MLK was assassinated – it’s one of the best, if not the best speech I’ve ever heard.  In any case, I wish all the best to the Kennedy’s and their family.  All things have a beginning and ending.  Perhaps the sun has set on their political dynasty.  In honor of the former lawmaker, several of our must reads are law related.  Without further ado, here are some things you should read:

1.  Mexico legalizes drug possession @ The NY Times – This is an interesting approach.  Amsterdam’s approach is a little bit different, allowing drugs only in controlled areas and environments.  This is broader, and includes “harder drugs,” including small amounts of cocaine and heroin.  Drugs are a major problem in Mexico.  I wonder what affect this will have.  I have often heard it theorized that legalizing marijuana would save us a lot of money in the legal system, as well as adding lots of tax revenue to the country.  Amsterdam has extremely low incidents of violent crime, but lots of pick pockets and petty crimes.  We’ll see if a “small amount” of heroin has the same affect on people in Mexico that marijuana has in Amsterdam.

2.  CSI Fraud: Researchers Craft Fake DNA evidence @ Ars Technica – I don’t know if this scares you, but it scares me.  Being wrongfully accused of a crime is scary.  Being wrongfully accused of a crime where they have DNA evidence against you is downright terrifying.  Also scary is the new difficulty prosecutors will have in getting convictions.  DNA evidence won’t be the overwhelming, automatic conviction that it has been historically.

3.  Man Executed for Arson Murders, Experts Say Fire Wasn’t Arson @ PoliGazette – Staying with the theme, check out this story about a man that was executed for arson…but now no one thinks it’s arson.  Best argument against the death penalty I’ve heard is – what if you’re wrong?  There’s not really a good comeback for that.  I agree that there are bad people that can’t coexist with the good people, but you’d better be pretty careful if you’re going to execute those bad people.

4.  How Much is Your Time Really Worth @ Weakonomics – This is a good post about how to decide whether to hire someone.  I especially like that he suggests considering the cost of acquiring the skills to do the job.  This is a great suggestion because once you know how to do something, you can do it again in the future at no additional cost.  Plus, you could now potentially be hired to do whatever you were going to hire someone else for.  The only thing I would add – it’s not just the absolute cost or value of your time that matters – it also matters how much you value the luxury of not doing something.  I park my car instead of using valet because I don’t value someone parking my car enough to require the extra expenditure.  If it were very painful for me to walk, or if I were wearing a tuxedo and it was raining really hard (no umbrella), or insert exigent circumstance here – I might value having someone park my car more highly.

Understanding the Federal Budget @ Get Rich Slowly – Very nice, simple post on how the Federal Budget works.  Check it out and be educated.  Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Long Term Optimists from a Time Not Unlike This One

I found this gem on Youtube. The image quality isn’t spectacular, but it’s definitely worth your time. I especially enjoyed the analogies and thoughts from Sir John Templeton. Templeton died last year. If you don’t know who he is, take a minute and read his wikipedia page. He was known for being not only a great investor, but a great philanthropist. In the interview, he seemed to be a little more fun than Lynch.  He seemed sort of folksy, kind of like this guy.

Peter Lynch is one of the most successful mutual fund managers of all time (He took Magellan from about $14 million in assets to $18 billion over the course of 22 years). He’s also well known for writing the books One Up on Wall Street and Beating the Street, both excellent books that I’ve read and recommend. Lynch is famous for his maxim to “buy what you know.” Don’t buy companies if you don’t understand what they make or do and don’t buy a company if you don’t understand how they can be successful going forward. He’s had some big winners in retail, for instance, and he talks in his books about how he would go to the mall just to see where people were going. If something seemed like a hot spot, he would investigate how cheap or expensive the stock was and go from there. When I first started investing, Lynch’s books were actually two of the books that really spoke to me and appealed to me.

The advice they give in the video applies to any era. Both of their approaches were somewhat different, but both were grounded in common sense and relied on patience and the right temperament. A couple of highlights:

Earnings are the key. A company will rise if their earnings rise. Markets aren’t efficient all the time, but if a stock is undervalued, eventually that value will be realized by the market. Sir John Templeton states in the video that he tends to hold stocks for 5 years or more, because it often takes that long to realize that value. You or I may not have the same convictions in our stock picks as Sir Templeton;)

Anyway, if you’re at work and can’t watch the video, I hope you’ll come back to it when you get a chance. Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments


The Economics of Crime
If they make another The Longest Yard, they should hire Plax as a consultant.

If they make another The Longest Yard, they should hire Plax as a consultant.

That title implies a much wider, sweeping scope than this post is actually about.  It’s actually just a thought about the economics of one particular incident.  Plaxico Burress, an NFL wide receiver formerly of the New York Giants, was sentenced to 2 years for violating the gun laws in New York when he accidentally shot himself in a night club.

I can’t help but think that this sentence was somewhat politically driven.  When a person of some celebrity goes to jail, it’s not a surprise that politics are involved.  On the surface, I can’t say that I disagree with it.  Burress broke the law, and the sentence is within the range of punishment under the laws of that state.  Gun laws in NY do seem to be particularly harsh, but that’s the way they’ve chosen to govern their state, and perhaps studies have shown that harsher gun laws have led to less crime (I honestly don’t know but that makes sense to me).

Obviously, there’s a philosophical side.  I’ve heard people call this a victimless crime, like prostitution or gambling.  Of course, laws aren’t only in place to vindicate acts in which someone was harmed – they also exist to prevent crime from happening.  There are basically two ways to deter crime (according to Steven Levitt), you can (1) Raise the probability of apprehension, or (2) increase the severity of the punishment.  Those two are related.  If the probability of apprehension is low, then the severity of punishment needs to be high in order to deter crime.

I want to look at a different side of the issue.  An economic side.  If we assume, as I do, that Plaxico Burress is neither dangerous nor a menace to society, then why is he being incarcerated?  To pay his debt to society?  I think an economist would say that the most efficient way for him to pay his debt to society would be with his money (Judge Richard Posner says that very thing).  Instead of putting Burress in jail, where he’ll actually cost the taxpayers money (unless he can produce lots of furniture and license plates) – why not give him an extremely high monetary fine.  Burress made $11 million last season.

How much value will he create in prison?  A negative number?  A very small positive number?  Wouldn’t it make more sense to make him pay a hefty fine.  Again, this is only assuming that he’s not dangerous.  What if you made him pay a fine of $10 million over 2 years instead of going to jail.  What would benefit the people of New York more?  There could even be a mandate that the $10 million be put toward enforcing the gun control laws in the state of New York.

Of course, on some level, this is offensive.  Should a professional athlete be able to effectively “buy” his freedom, just because it’s what’s best for the people?  Is it even what’s best for the people?  Shouldn’t he get whatever punishment that any other citizen would have gotten?  I’m not so sure that this is a sentence that any other citizen would have gotten.  Donte Stallworth (another NFL wide receiver – tough league) recently killed someone in a drunk driving accident and got 29 days in jail.  Burress gets 2 years for shooting himself in the leg.  I’m not so sure your average Joe goes to prison over having a gun, especially if they didn’t have a record to begin with.  I don’t know.  I could be wrong about that.  I don’t think I am.

Fines are a solution that the market likes.  It’s basically a tax on wrong doing.  If someone is dangerous, and they need to be separated from society for the greater good, then of course, imprisonment is the right solution.  Many studies have shown and it is widely accepted in sociological terms that prison does not rehabilitate.  So the only purpose is to protect people by taking the crimes they would be committing out of society.  Anyway, just thought I would throw this out in light of a pretty interesting news story.  What do you think about the idea of using fines whenever possible and avoiding jail time?  Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Consumer Information

Resize_of_Consumer_Reports_April_2006_Cover

I’ve heard a lot of whining about the media in my life.  Depending on your point of view, the media is too liberal, not objective enough – whatever.  I think something everyone can agree on is that for better or worse, the media is tremendously powerful.  They influence who we vote for, what we believe, and what we buy or do.

I saw a commercial for Chevy Sunday while I was watching John Smoltz and the Cardinals beat the San Diego Padres.  In the commercial, Howie Long explains that although public perception tends to be that Japanese cars tend to be the most reliable, highest quality cars, Consumer Digest has rated several of the cars as being “Consumer Best Buys” (which sounds eerily like Consumer Reports Best Bets).

I’d just like to point out that Consumer Reports is a non-profit print and online publication put out by Consumers Union.  Consumer Reports doesn’t allow their recommendations and test results to be used in advertising.  They don’t accept anything from any of the companies or products they review.  They do this for obvious but important reasons.  They want to make sure that they’re not being swayed by any of the companies involved and that they’re serving the purpose they exist for – to protect the consumer.

It’s important to note that Consumer Digest is none of these things.  Since I just saw it on a Chevy commercial, I know that they allow their results to be used in advertising.  Further, they’re a for profit organization.  They have no connection or affiliation to Consumer Reports (or, as far as I know, Reader’s Digest, Golf Digest, or any other Digest;)).  They’re out to make a buck, and I would bet that for the right price your car can be a Consumer Digest best buy.

J.D Power and Associates, for example is a marketing firm.  They’re in the business of giving out awards.  They give out awards in very specific categories, making the awards meaningless.  Despite this, J.D. Power is a successful company that makes money.  For my money though, as a consumer, I’m going to keep sticking the recommendations handed out by Consumer Reports, since they aren’t depending on the company’s they review for their paychecks.  Don’t be fooled by clever, tricky marketing.

As for Chevy vehicles recommended in the ad, I don’t know anything about whether they’re good, legitimate vehicles.  I’m in no position to evaluate that.  If I were in the market for a vehicle, though (or really any other consumer good), I’d consult Consumer Reports.  Try to filter out all that other garbage that’s out there.  Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , ,

6 Comments


Blood on the Streets

Happy Friday!  Yesterday I wrote about how well the market has performed since Warren Buffett encouraged us to buy American.  I couldn’t keep myself from also comparing the markets performance in relation to the March lows.  Just for fun, I decided I’d do the same thing with my own portfolio.

I’d like to preface this post by saying that almost all of my wife and I’s invested money is in retirement accounts invested in low cost Vanguard index funds.  We’re not relying on anyone’s ability to beat the market for our long term wealth.  At the same time, I like picking stocks, and we do hold a few individual positions.  We’ve held all of our positions for quite some time, with very little movement.  There have been some things we considered doing over the last year or so, but on every occasion we’ve decided to do something a different.

I have mixed emotions about sharing my personal portfolio, because in the state its in, I’m admitting I’ve been wrong about a lot of things.  I’m not going to tell you what price I entered the positions in.  In some cases, I think that would be bragging or whining (depending on the result), and I’m not sure that would serve a purpose.  What I’d like the point of this post to be is something that we already know – the time for investing is when there’s blood in the streets – so all I’m going to focus on is the best possible date – March 9th (just because I think that’s fun).

The slash lines are the ticker symbol, the March 9th price, today’s price, and the percentage change.  There are 8 positions total and they’re presented in no particular order.

Company Name, Ticker, March 9th, 2009 price, Todays price, % change

Berkshire Hathaway, BRK-B, $2,310.00, $3,274.50, +41.75%

Conoco Phillips, COP, $35.78, $43.25, +20.88%

Bank of America, BAC, $3.75, $17.14, +357.07%

Ace, Ltd, ACE, $31.43,$50.78, +61.56%

Disney, DIS, $15.59, $25.89, +66.07%

Google, GOOG, $290.89, $460.41, +58.28%

Linn Energy, LINE, $12.13, $21.39, +76.33%

Mastech Holdings, MHH, $1.75, $3.30, +88.57%

A couple of notes on the holdings.  It’s obvious why I own Berkshire.  We like having a small piece of our fate tied to Buffett’s.  Rachel and I are fans of his.  I like who he is and the way he carries himself.  I think he’s a good man who legitimately cares about the world.

We bought ACE, BAC, COP and DIS a long time ago and have held them for awhile.  We bought these stocks because we felt like they would be steady, long term stocks that would consistently pay us dividends and increase their earnings over time.  BAC and COP obviously aren’t the same companies we invested in.  We did buy some BAC pretty low to lower our basis, and that investment has worked out well.  Obviously, there was a lot of uncertainty surrounding BAC.  The day that people were really worried about the banks being nationalized, BAC momentarily dropped below $2.50.  Rachel and I discussed putting a large amount of money in BAC at that point.  We didn’t, because we decided we’d be gambling.  We didn’t believe the government would nationalize the banks, but we would be betting on that belief versus market forces with better information.  That decision would have made us thousands of dollars – but I still feel like it was the right one.

Google is a stock we’ve held, sold for a large profit, and then bought again when it’s price started to freefall.  I’ve always been impressed with Google and their vision.  Their mission has to do with more than money, and that makes them hard not to root for.  The fact that they make money makes it even better.  This time around we feel like we got in near rock bottom prices, and are planning on holding unless prices get ridiculous again.

Linn Energy is a copycat stock.  I followed Seth Klarman’s portfolio and got into the stock based on its impressive dividend return (currently just under 12%).  It’s had a pretty solid run up (probably based on copy cats like us).  It may have run it’s course.  If the dividend is in jeopardy (I don’t know whether it is or not), it’s probably time to get out.  It’s been a pretty good one.  Klarman knows his stuff.

Mastech is a spin-off.  I learned about the high returns offered by spin-offs reading an excellent book by Joel Greenblatt with a stupid title.  Spin-offs tend to make above average returns.  The company still matters, and there’s more to it, but in retrospect I wish I had thrown more money at this bad boy.

The moral is that investing in any of these companies, and many others, during the worst part of this year – you would have made out very well.  If you didn’t, you aren’t alone.  We didn’t buy much either.  We didn’t sell anything, but besides adding to some positions here and there we mostly stood pat.  I’m not advocating that you try to time the market – Warren Buffett himself says that he can’t do that.  I am advocating that you continue to invest and stick to your strategy during times of extreme market turmoil.  The people in the worst shape are the people who sold near the lows and are buying back in now that markets are more “stable.”  Markets may be more “stable” but stocks are also selling at higher prices than before.  If you have a method for determining fair market value of a company, stick to that (or steal someone else’s).  Good luck and thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Warren Buffett Speaks
Buffett enjoying a Peanut Buster Parfait.

Buffett enjoying a Peanut Buster Parfait.

Warren Buffett has another op-ed in the NY Times.  This one is titled The Greenback Effect.  It’s a well written piece and I encourage you all to read it.  It’s worth your time.  The basic point of the article is that although the stimulus was initially necessary, the US needs to make its spending more sustainable or the dollar is going to suffer.  Completely logical, and it’s nothing that people are saying in coffee shops all over the country.  Buffett saying it doesn’t make it any more true – but it makes it more likely that people who can do something about it will listen (case in point).  Plus, it’s fun to see a NY Time article with his name on it.  I’m not sure there’s anyone they could get to write for them whose opinions I’d be more interested in (though he isn’t the only big name that’s been writing opinion pieces for them lately).

Seeing this piece brought to mind the piece that Buffett wrote in the NY Times last October, urging us to buy American in the midst of an economy that was flailing.  Anytime you hear Buffett say anything about the direction of markets, he’ll tell you that he can’t predict the short term gyrations of the market.  He doesn’t think anyone else can, either (who am I to disagree?).  He doesn’t try to predict the short term direction of markets in this piece, either.

The piece was, in part, simply an attempt to calm people’s fears.  In The Intelligent Investor, Benjamin Graham personifies the market as being a moody fellow – swinging from extreme euphoria (Greenspan might call it irrational exuberance) to extreme depression.  Buffett’s article was an attempt to keep that depression in perspective.  I think the other reason for the article was honest, sincere long term optimism in America.  Part of the reason for Buffett’s optimism comes from his personality.  It’s part of what makes him such a patient investor.

Clearly, Buffett’s vote of confidence was directed at toward the long term direction of the markets.  I thought it might be fun (and hopefully useful in some way) to look at what the markets have done since his article.  Hint: things got much worse before they got better.

First, the overall performance.  The S&P 500 closed at 996.46.  The piece ran on October 16th.  On October 15th, the S&P sat at 907.84.  Since Buffett’s prediction ran, the market is +9.76%.  Of course, things got worse before they got better.  On March 9th, 2009, the market closed at 676.53.  If you had invested your money on that day, you’d be +47.29%.  Buffett’s call wasn’t an attempt to time the market.  He was simply saying what he always says, when there’s blood on the streets, that’s usually the time to invest.  Overall, we’re still in the short term.  When Warren says you should Buy American, he just means that eventually (10, 15, 20 years) down the road, you’ll be glad you put your money to work.

I’m not advocating anything, here, just thought I would toss out some numbers in retrospect.  I have no idea what the markets will do going forward.  If you’ve been investing during this downturn, you’re probably in the black.  Buffett’s famous saying – be greedy when others are fearful and fearful when others are greedy has proven (again!) to be very true.  On March 9th, people were pretty fearful.  Hopefully you were buying hand over fist.  Thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments


Only a Business Owner Can Sell Like a Business Owner

property management 1

This is my second attempt at interviewing someone on the blog.  Like the previous interview, we did it all by email.  If anything got lost in translation, let me know, and I’ll try to sort it out!  The end product made sense to me, so hopefully it will make sense to you as well.  My goal going forward is to include two interviews on the blog per month.  I’m going to try to focus on entrepreneurs, but I’ll also probably interview a variety of people who know how to do something specific that I’ve never done before.

The interviewee today is Chris Majerle.  Chris was kind enough to answer some questions about his property management company, MMI.  MMI (Majerle Management, Inc.) has been in business since 1987, and Chris has managed to grow his business to include more than 1100 units.  If you’re in the market for someone to manage your rentals in the D.C. area, check them out.  But enough from me, I’ll let him tell you in his own words.

What is your educational background?

Two years of college with an emphasis on biology and health sciences.  Originally, I was interested in Pharmacy or Anesthesia.  That wasn’t for me!  I saw an ad for a real estate agent, took the 45 hour course and got my license.  Once into the field, I continued my training by securing my Graduate Realtor’s Institute (GRI) designation, my broker’s license and later took a series of classes and exams, culminating in a case study, to earn the Professional Community Association Manager (PCAM) designation.

What (if anything) did you do career wise before you got into real estate?

This was my first real career—I started in real estate sales and migrated toward the property management specialty.

How did you transition from real estate sales into property management?

When I was a kid, I worked on our house with my dad.  He painted, finished basements and did all the maintenance and yard work.  Sometimes, for a few extra dollars, he did some of this for others.  I tagged along.  I’m talking about doing this work at 8 or 10 years old.  And I never stopped.  I painted houses while in college.  I never bought a nice house for myself-only fixer-uppers.  And I got my home improvement license so I could do it for others.  As you can imagine, knowing how to fix just about anything is a definite plus for a property manager.  Now, 33 years later, I still do all of it.  Today, we have the home improvement business to help support the property management business.

Customer service is more than answering the phone nicely; it’s being able to get to the root of the problem and suggest a solution.  With the maintenance skills in my pocket, I answer a call expecting that the caller really doesn’t understand the real problem.  If the refrigerator is stopped, I want to know whether the bulb comes on with the door open.  If not (assuming it did yesterday), there’s a pretty good chance we don’t need an appliance service call.  We may need a breaker reset or an electrician.  All we need to do is run an extension cord from another outlet.  Similar efforts can aid in diagnosing the real source of a water leak, an air conditioning or heating problem or a water problem.

For me, the transition was crying out, I belonged on the rental management side.

What does property management entail?

Everyone thinks we collect rent, take our fee and send the rest to the owner.  But there can be a bit more.  Certainly, balancing the desires of the tenant, the orders from the local inspectors (or the knowledge of the housing code) and the financial wishes of the owner can present challenges.  We are big believers in fixing things before they deteriorate to the point where replacement is the only option.  Real estate is a long-term investment and we should look at the big picture from the maintenance perspective.

Today, property management is an information business.  Our services, including receipt of payments, rental applications and processing, maintenance service requests, owner payment disbursements and more are online.  Often, we juggle two or three software packages, all online (ASP), to fulfill everyone’s desire.  All these packages must talk to each other seamlessly.

But what is information without the knowledge to back it up?  In our jurisdiction, virtually every rental unit must be licensed by the county or the city.  Many are eligible to or mandated to participate in a state-run lead poisoning prevention program.  Owners need counsel on property insurance, taxes, mortgage planning, home remodeling and more.  We are expected to provide enough information to give owners the intelligent questions they need to take to their insurance or mortgage brokers, attorneys and accountants.  We don’t give advice; that would be illegal.  Alternatively, if we don’t, we would be negligent.  We walk a tightrope!

Other services include property inspection; not the type you would pay $400 to a property inspector to obtain, but a periodic visit to the property to examine the overall property maintenance condition and the tenancy performance.  These visits, every six months at our firm, are followed by a written report to the owner, often with photos.  We prepare vacancies for market, we advertise for tenants, we screen applicants for credit, income and rental history, we prepare leases, we collect rents, pay bills, disburse owner funds and report all of this on an income statement each month.  When tenants vacate, we inspect for damage, assess the costs, account or the security deposit, make the disbursements and start the vacancy marketing process all over again.

Again, it’s a long term investment.  Owners need information and help maximizing the long-term profit, much of which comes from the eventual sale.  That information comes from our real estate experience and our REALTOR membership.  We have access to MLS data and know how to sell.  Thus, we are in a position to keep owners apprised of the value and marketability of their properties – not all rental managers are licensed as it is not required, even here in Maryland.

When did you go into business for yourself?  What prompted the decision?  What was initially necessary?  Did you form a business entity (what type – LLC, Corp., etc.)?  What services did you outsource initially?  Legal services?  Accounting?   Did you talk to a CPA?

I made the jump to property management in 1982, at a time when many real estate companies were failing.  The firm I was with had 27 offices and closed.  I jumped to a small, franchised real estate company hoping to retain a portion of my management portfolio, and I did.  After 4 years, I found that my department remained a stepchild.  I had absolutely no support, even though I was generating more income than any other agent in the firm.  I left and struck out on my own.  I did it with a credit card and my eyes closed!  Fortunately, half of my portfolio from the other firm came along.  I opened MMI in the basement of a rented home with a copier, a 2-line phone, a computer and a file cabinet.  Sometimes I long for those days!

But, having no money, I sought very little advice.  I prepared my own Articles of Incorporation and filed them myself.  I did ask an accountant whether to opt for Subchapter S and I did so.  There was no outsourcing.  From 9:00 to 5:00, I answered the phones and coordinated repairs.  After 5:00, I was a leasing agent – showing property until it was dark.  Saturday morning, I was often found at a property doing cleaning and painting.

Most of my forms came from prior companies or from REALTOR associations.  Yes, it would have been better to get all that advice.  Today, I would say it’s essential.  Times are very different today from 23 years ago.  At least, in Maryland, there is plenty of regulation and what we can do varies from county to county, city to city.  I would not try it today the same way I did it in 1987.

Did you create a business plan?  If so, what did the plan entail?

I’m going to treat this like a trick question – you didn’t ask when I created my plan.  So, no, I did not create a plan in 1987.  In fact, I knew nothing about running a business back then.  All I cared about was staying in business and generating enough cash to keep the wolves away.

Then, I read a business-changing book, The E-Myth Revisited by Michael Gerber.  This book convinced me I was working IN my business instead of ON my business.  After more than 15 years, I realized that all I owned was a job.  I had nothing to sell and no plan to make my business grow.  So I started working on that condition.  I had a couple of property managers working for me and I needed more.  I planned some expansion.  With that, I would have to train people to do what I do just the way I would do it myself.  So, I wrote a 200 page training manual and started teaching.  Today, I have 9 managers – some of the best in the area.  I developed checklists to enable them to properly inspect a property, how to secure a new account and turn-in the right paperwork, how to lease a property, and, again, turn-in the right paperwork, how to close out a tenancy and even how to close out an owner’s account.  Today, we manage more than 200 homes and I don’t manage any of them!  We have now expanded into condominium and homeowner’s association management, and, in about 5 years, have 12 communities with more than 1,100 units.  Already, I have a business!  I stopped doing the clients accounting and I stopped answering the phones myself.  In fact, I never check my voicemail – someone does that for me.  My job: get new business, hire and train the staff.  I’m working on my business!

What were some of the greatest challenges you faced in getting your company off the ground in the beginning?

Of course, money is always and issue.  But, the truth is, it is not as important as one might think.  Plan to spend only what you can make it go as far as it can.  There are lots of ways to get business without spending a ton of money on advertising – and some of those means are more effective and generate better quality business.  I’m talking about networking.  Those early days, you’d hear me say I don’t have time to do that.  Today, that’s my #1 duty.  Only the business owner can sell the business like a business owner.  I have to be face to face with prospective clients and strategic partners on a daily basis.  How can I do that and still do the accounting and inspect the properties?

It all boils down to making choices.  You can do it all yourself or you can find ways to get the help you need and to use it effectively.  READ, READ, READ – read motivational books.  Read business books.  Read success stories.  Learn from everything you read.  For me, the challenge was that I didn’t know, I didn’t read, I didn’t listen to people who knew.  Now, maybe you’re listening to me;)

At what point did you hire your first employee, and for what position?  How did you recruit good employees?

I thought I needed a secretary.  Maybe I did – we still used typewriters in those days.  She did answer phones when I was out – that was good for business.  My next hire was a bookkeeper – no reason why I couldn’t get away from the computer a few hours a day.

I made good hires only when I was lucky.  I made my share of bad hires, too.  Why did this happen?  Well, I didn’t develop job descriptions.  I didn’t visualize the perfect hire.  Most importantly, in the early days, I did no training.  I told them what to do and left them to themselves – it’s not wonder they often failed in their positions.

To recruit good employees, provide a work atmosphere where everyone wants to work.  Provide free training and support.  Provide fun.  Be professional, sure.  But, you don’t need a stuffy environment.  As a leader, balance the desire for work performance with the need for a healthy work environment.  If you’ve made a bad decision, reverse that decision quickly.  Bad employees NEVER get better!  That’s N E V E R.

Of course, benefits and top wages are important.  But it is often said that an employee values flex time or vacation more than an extra dollar.  And, they’re cheaper for you.  Many of my personnel are out in the field all day – that’s what they tell me.  All I can do is evaluate their performance.  Hours are unimportant and impossible for me to track, so I don’t sweat it.  And, you know, I often see them in the office in the evening or on weekends.  The concept must work.  I once heard that the best investment a company can make is to buy its executive a laptop.  They’ll take them on vacation and will steal away from the beach for an hour or two to check their email.  But, it’s their decision and their schedule.  They’ll love it.

Oh, and that networking thing – it doesn’t just get business.  I have hired people right out of my networking groups.  These are people that I have personally come to know.  What better way to hire?

Any employee horror stories?  Any doozy interview questions?  How many employees do you currently have?

Not every reference is as valuable as it might seem.  I once hired a person because a close friend recommended the guy.  Turned out, this guy had become a coke addict and alcoholic.  He was partying in my office with wine, women and drugs – all night long.  But, during the day, he was stealing money from our clients.

I’m not the best person to ask about how to interview, but I do have three pieces of hiring advice: (1) shut up and listen; (2) ask questions that force the interviewee to tell stories of how they deal with problems they may face and (3) have at least one or two other members of your staff interview each applicant.

I have 5 full-time employees in the management company, one in the home improvement company.  All tolled, there are 15 of us, but the rest are independent contractors.  We’re basically a two-tiered management structure with me as the CEO and our controller serving in an executive capacity.  All the rental and community managers report to me; paid staff reports primarily to him.

Hire out of promote from within?

Promotion from within in a nice concept, but there can be too great an emphasis placed on giving to the existing staff when they may not have the skills to advance.  Back to that job description – if the existing staff can fill the job and their job would be easier to fill than the current vacancy, it’s a no-brainer.  Otherwise, give them a chance to compete, but open the position to outside applicants, too.

What equipment, software, knowledge, etc. are required to start/run a property management company?

We have to know everything about everything!  I still have a small firm, but we’re now growing at 30% or more annually.  So, our computers have had to be linked through a network.  Now, our property managers have to have remote access to email and files (and you want them using YOUR systems so you retain the data when they leave).  Even the phone systems have become complex: IP phones, Blackberries and SmartPhones.  We have to support all of this – whether we own the equipment or our staff owns it.

Accounting software has evolved into information databases and the internet access portals for the clients.  That’s not too complex!  So, either you have to know everything about everything or you have to hire someone who does.  If you have the luxury of hiring, see the previous interview question, you must hire your contractors and vendors with equal care.  Then, it’s better to hire, but try to keep-up on technology to help ensure that everyone is performing.  It’s no different for me than evaluating a painter.  I used to paint, so I know how long it takes to paint a room.  I also set-up our computer systems and I know what I want them to do – I just don’t want to troubleshoot the problems myself.

How do you get customers/business?  What kind of marketing materials do you use?  Has your approach to getting business and growing your business changed significantly over time?

We spend a great deal of money on advertising – most of it through the internet.  We use pay-per-click services; some targeting property management, some not.  Making the phones ring is not that hard.  Having them properly answered, having a skilled salesperson on your end of the line is the real challenge.

Over time, we’ve learned that people who call on ads have no one else to call – they have no experience and they have no knowledgeable friends.  Referrals are your best source of business.  Today, there are all kinds of referral networks, trade associations and networking organizations – join them!  You can’t eliminate advertising, but you can sure enhance the results.  Develop a plan to approach and evaluate your best strategic partners and work that plan.  The business will come.

What do you wish you had known about business when you were first starting out?  What advice would you give to a new business owner or someone looking to start or  acquire a business?

It can no longer be done of $5,000 and be competitive.  Our software alone took $18,000 to implement and we pay almost $10,000 annually for licenses.  Our computers would cost $50,000 or more to replace.  When you have the finances, spend carefully and in a controlled manner.  Budgeting is a lost art.  Develop a budget and look at it regularly – I recommend quarterly.

Spend your time and effort growing the business, but make sure you handle it when you get it.  Referrals are only good when they’re good referrals.  You don’t need bad PR when you’re starting out.  You want every customer to be your ambassador.

Do you have or have you ever had someone you’d consider a mentor?  What did you learn from them?

I’m a worker.  I always have been.  Although not necessarily an answer to the question, it’s good to recognize that running a business takes long hours for several years.  I don’t know how many years – I’m still working long hours.  I do it because I love it.   But, if you’re not a worker now, you won’t be much more of a worker when you own the joint.  If you’re more into punching a clock, punch someone else’s.

Yes, I worked with a partner when I started in real estate, a guy who was old enough to have retired from his first career and was starting another.  He saw my energy and was generating more business than he wanted to handle.  I’m not sure I had the willingness to do some of the hard things – the networking and marketing – that he expected, so it didn’t work out.  But, I certainly learned that those were the things that made him successful; not the busy work.  His name was George.  George carried a briefcase to work – and eventually carried a larger, file system case.  No, not instead, in addition to the briefcase!  One day, George walked in with nothing but a clipboard.  Everyone noticed.  George decided all he really needed to carry was a listing form and a contract.

It’s really easy to get bogged down by paperwork.  And, there is important paperwork, no doubt.  But, in the end, unless you’re getting and keeping business, none of that paperwork will pay the bills.  Dump the briefcase and get to what’s important just as soon as you possibly can – that’s what separates the business owners from the rest.

How has the real estate business changed since you were first starting out?  What do you think about where your local market is right now?

Look outside right now.  Look again in 12 hours – that’s how much change there has been.  George would need the large case just to carry the forms to complete a single sale!  We’re much more disclosure-oriented today and the paperwork reflects all that.  In fact, some of us not so jokingly say that we think if we disclose enough, we won’t disclose anything.  If you buy them in paper, they won’t read it.  Case in point: The US Congress.  No more 2-page bills.  They’re a thousand pages and no one reads any of it.

Disclosure came because people were getting raw deals.  Governments required the forms.  Lawyers suggested more.  Then, as our government is all too good at doing, they found ways to spend money they didn’t have.  In the name of consumer protection, they started licensing agencies and programs.  I know for a fact that there’s no way to stay in full compliance.  I monitor the performance of my staff with regard to such compliance and it’s a never ending job.  they just can’t meet all the deadlines and still have time to make all the money.  So, we’re forced to do the best we can do and resolve to strive for better, but we’ll never get to perfect.

I’m in the Washington, DC market.  Even here, we’re suffering, but not like other places in the US.  Government is growing and with it, all the support systems.  Values have come down, but mainly because they were, here like everywhere else, artificially inflated due to an unrealistic expectation that the euphoria would never end.  Well, it ended here, too.  But, there’s always room for a good company to grow and we’ve never stopped marketing, networking and training.  As a result, both our rental department and our community management departments are growing by double digits.  They’re carrying the home improvement company along for the ride.  It’s a good thing I’m finally working on running my business because I believe we are doing a better job now than when we were struggling.

What do you attribute your success to?

I found my niche.  I have knowledge of construction and maintenance and I have a good understanding of accounting.  That covers about 90% of what we do.  But, my networking efforts and my quest for designations have taken me places all around the country where I have been able to learn from people who were not my next-door competitor.  People half way across the country are much more willing to tell their secrets.

After reading The E-Myth, I began to redirect my efforts to growing staff and it has paid-off.  Our gross revenues are up 400% over 6 years.  With a few extra bucks, you can hire more staff, buy better software, move to more impressive space and simply look more successful.  People are attracted to success – success breeds success, they say.

Also worthy of mention is age.  Yes, I’m getting older.  A wise, Jewish neighbor of mine once told me, on my 40th birthday, that “40 is a good age – people will grovel to you – let them.”  I don’t know how much they’re groveling, but they sure seem to respect my staying power and accumulated knowledge.  That helps get those referrals.  But, I digress, this isn’t at all where I was going with the age thing.  With age comes patience.  We understand that there will be another opportunity; even a better one.  We know that fortunes are generally not made overnight.  We understand that our patience gives us an advantage over those who have not yet learned the skill.  Several years ago, I was so close to making a purchase – three fixer upper townhouses for $150k.  I’d fix each for about $10,000 or so and sell them for $75,000 each.  A healthy profit in about 6 months.  Well the owner wanted more and she got it.  I couldn’t believe people paid $68,000, $73,000 and $88,000 for those places!  One of them actually hired me to do the renovations and we charged a lot more than $10,000.  And, I think all those people flipped them and sold them for a profit.  I was wrong.  I did not see that we were in the early stages of the housing boom.  Well, my patience paid off.  I refused to pay those prices.  I did not get caught-up in the buying frenzy.  Did I miss a deal or two?  Of course.  But I know so many people who kept buying and flipping and, surprise!  They got caught with their pants down.  Today, they’re losing one at a time to foreclosure and many will lose it all.  Oh, and I’m still here – I’m not ready to buy all those properties they’re losing…for half of what they may have paid.

Where do you see yourself in 10 years?  At what point do you think you’ll become less involved in the day to day operations of your business?  Will you sell the business or tap a successor when you’re ready to retire?

I see myself floating on my yacht in 10 years.  Three if I’m lucky.  Property management businesses take about 30 seconds to sell, so that’s an option.  My preference would be to find a successor and retain a piece.  I’m also willing to merge with another firm if we can complement each other and become greater than the sum of our parts.  I think about retirement.  Funny you shoud ask about the 10 year number – that’s kind of the target.  Meanwhile, I’d like to slow it down and I do see that in the future of my firm.  All I really need to do is more of what I’ve been doing for the last 5 years.

What are you reading?  Fiction or non-fiction?  Do you have a favorite book?  Real estate book?

I never was a reader.  Only recently have I really started to enjoy reading.  And, I do now enjoy a bit of fiction.  For someone who doesn’t read very much, Chesapeake took me nearly 4 months with some 800 pages.  Yesterday, I finished Abraham Lincoln: Team of Rivals – just shy of 750 pages.  I am absolutely NOT a reader of real estate books.  I’ve never read one that taught how to do it right – it’s all about doing it with no money and no risk.  What I know about real estate enabled me to recognize (a) that you cannot use the no money concept in conjunction with no risk and (b) that most of what they taught was totally illegal.

Soccer or baseball?  Europe or the beach?  New York or LA?  Orioles or Nationals?  Redskins or Ravens?  Wine or scotch?

Sunshine and water.  We have a nice boat – some might call it a yacht, but we know what we really want.  Lazy weekends anchored on a Chesapeake tributary with a rum drink and some music…that’s life.  Now, I need to find it somewhere I can do it for more than 5 months out of the year.  We have a lot of summer hobbies: the boat and a big Harley, but nothing in the winter.  We do have a few favorite spots in Mexico and try to get there once or twice a year.

I’m looking for a sports team that will wear my company logo just because I’m paying for their kids educations by attending a single game…haven’t found that yet.  I like baseball, football, hockey and NASCAR, but I’m tired of the money being more important than the game.  So, I’ll get off the couch and workout or row a boat.  It will make me healthier and help me retain my money so I can retire, even if not to the same neighborhood as the athlete.

*****

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments


The Millionaire Next Door

MillionnaireNextDoor

Until recently, I had never read The Millionaire Next Door by Thomas J. Stanley and William D. Danko.  Why?  A couple or reasons.  For one, I don’t think you need to read a slew of introductory personal finance books.  One or two will do it.  Once you have those basic core principles down pat, you don’t need to keep up with reading the introductory stuff.  If you want to improve yourself from a personal finance perspective, you should read more advanced books in specific areas that interest you.  I’ve read my share of introductory level personal finance books.  The Millionaire Next Door may be the best one.  Now that I’ve read it, I think it puts a unique spin on the same topic.  It has a competitive advantage over others in that they compiled their own data (and its good data) then drew conclusions in ways that fit their methodology.  So even if you’ve read all the big ones, I think this one is worth reading as well.  The other reason might be that I usually shy away from anything with “Get Rich, It’s Easy!” or “Millionaire” in the title.  I only read it when I did because my wife was kind enough to pick me up a $4 copy (1997 hardback version) as a gift from a used bookstore (thanks honey!).

I’m going to tell you from the outset, that The Millionaire Next Door is excellent, and I’m not going to “review” it.  Instead, I’m just going to hit on some of the key points that the book makes.  The book was written by two Professors, and is full of excellent research.  The Profs combed through gobs of data and surveys in order to try to determine who the wealthy in America are.  Their research ultimately culminated in this book, and that research gives us some of the most basic tenets of personal finance.  If you read this site and/or others like it, you’re not going to find anything earth shattering in this book, but you’re going to find it in a logical, straight forward way that’s supported by data.  Here are 10 things that struck me:

1.  Predictably, the data shows that most people who you believe to be very rich are not.  They might have high incomes, but high incomes often does not correlate with a high net worth.  The people with the highest net worths, statistically, aren’t the people you know with a $5000 watch or a Porshe.  Millionaires tend to be entrepreneurs who live frugally and save their money, rather than spending it on expensive consumer goods.  Does that surprise you?  Many high net worth individuals have never actually earned a high income – many of the millionaires in the book have never made $100,000 in a year.

2.  High net worth individuals, statistically, tend to be people that live within their means.  They don’t spend a lot of money.  They don’t waste money.  They tend to be pretty frugal people.  Obviously, the higher percentage of your income you save and invest, the higher net worth you’re going to have.

3.  The book divides people into two basic categories, (1) Under Accumulator’s of Wealth (UAW) and (2) Prodigious Accumulator’s of Wealth (PAW).  Doctor’s, for instance, tend to be UAWs.  Surprised?  In the book, one case study revealed that a doctor that had been making $500k per year had a net worth of less than $2 million (not counting his residence).  Doctors are a group that is singled out again and again.  My wife is a doc, and I can say from experience that she knows infinitely more about money than her peers.  Most of the people she went to med school with can’t tell you the difference between a Roth IRA and a 401(k).  To be honest, none of them think they need to know.  For the most part, they’re taking the approach of the doctors in the book – I’m going to make a lot of money so I don’t need to know anything about it or consciously save it.

4.  A decent amount of time is spent on how and what kind of cars that PAWs buy.  The authors point out that most of the riches people you know aren’t driving expensive luxury automobiles.  That’s what the people who want everyone to think they’re rich drive.  Statistically the people who drive luxury cars are PAWs.

On this note, I can’t tell you how many times people tell me someone is SO rich and that they bought this and this and this (it’s a lot).  Every time this happens, I think to myself – I bet that person isn’t as rich as you think he or she is.  Statistically, people with a lot of wealth live beneath their means.  Based on the data in the book, most of the people that have high net worths don’t look like it.  They’re more likely to be wearing a Timex than a Rolex.  Remember that the next time you’re tempted by the allure of a brand.  Financial independence tends to be more important to PAWs than status symbols.

5.  This is the most unsurprising thing I can think of, but statistically PAWs spend more time planning their financial future than UAWs.

6.  A part of the book I found very interesting was the part about “Economic Outpatient Care.”  Their research shows that parents tend to help the children that are the worst at making and managing their money – the authors refer to this (brilliantly), as weakening the weak.  In most of the cases examined, often the parents are encouraging the children to live a lifestyle above their means.  If you help your son or daughter with a down payment – they’re probably buying a house they couldn’t afford.  This makes them weaker.  Not only that, by putting them in that neighborhood they couldn’t afford – they’re setting them up for an unsustainable lifestyle.  They’ll want to send their children to expensive private schools they can’t afford, drive cars they can’t afford, etc.  This causes the parents to give them even more gifts.  Many of these children are doctors, lawyers, engineers and other well respected professions.

According to the authors, if you are going to pay for something for your children in adulthood, the most prudent thing to pay for is education.  I had an uncle that helped me with my education.  He didn’t pay for it all, but he helped a lot.  He subscribed to the “teach a man to fish” philosophy.  My wife’s father paid for her school.  We were very lucky in that respect.  We haven’t had to take money from anyone otherwise.  Our families taught us to fish, and put us in a position to be PAWs.

7.  Statistically, many more PAWs went to public schools and public universities than private schools and private universities (this one is my favorite).

8.  PAWs tend to have children that are economically self-sufficient.

9.  Here’s an interesting note.  An incredibly high percentage of PAWs tend to be self-employed or entrepreneurs.  Many of these business owners own less than glamorous businesses.  Let’s say, for example, that a pair of parents made their money by owning and operating a dry cleaning company.  They were frugal, saved their money, and now they’re worth almost $4 million.  What do they encourage their children to do?  They encourage them to be doctors, lawyers, and accountants.  Entrepreneurs often have money, but are insecure about status – so they encourage their children to pursue high status jobs.  I found this interesting.  They don’t encourage their children to become entrepreneurs and follow the path that they themselves have followed.  I didn’t comb through the data like the authors did, but in my experience, they’re spot on in this regard.

10.  There’s an entire chapter about what they think the jobs in demand will be.  The premise they start from is that there will be more wealth in the future, and they try to pinpoint services that they think will be in higher demand because of that.  I’m not going to reprint the job list here (read the book if you’re interested).  I disagree with some of their picks (and it’s my blog;)).  Overall, excellent book.  It’s my new recommendation for someone that’s never read a personal finance book before, because, well, I love that they use so much data and that they compiled a lot of it (or funded the compilation) themselves.  Have you read the book?  Thoughts? Good luck on your road to becoming a PAW and thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , ,

5 Comments


5 Things You Should Read
I hope you're reading this a few yards from her.

I hope you're reading this a few yards from her.

I haven’t been doing a weekly link post for a while now.  I’m not really sure why.  In some ways, I really like doing them, and I usually posted them on Friday, when traffic is a little lower than throughout the week.  I’m bringing them back, and I’m changing the name from This Week in Review to 5 Things You Should Read.  This week is the exception, as obviously this is going up on a Monday.  In the future, I plan on slotting it in on Fridays.  I’ll use the intro as an opportunity to talk about whatever I want, then give you the links and a few words about each one.  I quit doing this for a while simply because a lot of the time I had things that I felt were more pressing.

Just as a quick note on why most bloggers have one of these posts each week (often called a Roundup or Review).  Bloggers do this for a couple of reason.  One is sort of a courtesy to one another.  If you have traffic, and find a blog that you like, it makes sense to share it with your readers.  We aren’t competing against each other, because, after all, you can read a lot more than one blog.  The other part of that courtesy is that links into your site helps your Google Page Rank, which in turn helps your search traffic within Google.  Page Rank is essentially based on the premise that the most important sites on the web are the sites that have been linked to the most.  They keep track of inbound links on a site and also consider how important the linking sites are.  This site, for instance, has a Google PR of 3 (It goes up to 10).  As site like Wikipedia or something would be a 10 (I didn’t look it up, I’m assuming).

By linking to these other bloggers, I’m theoretically helping their page rank.  In turn, if I write something they find useful, they might link to me.  I won’t ever link to something just because I think there’s a chance another blogger will link to me. I only link to article that I think are legitimately useful or interesting, or that will be of particular interest to my readers (for instance, some of my readers with a value investing slant might like Old School Value).  I often link to bloggers that specifically don’t do link roundups frequently (some bloggers don’t – like Penelope Trunk – who I’ve linked to many times).  Anyway, if you don’t blog, I hope that gives insight into why you see so many link based post on people’s blogs.  I honestly think it can be valuable, and I like the idea of Friday being a day where you catch up and have the opportunity to read all the best stuff I came across over the course of the week.  Without further ado…

Your Home Never Was an Investment @ Free Money Finance – The best piece of advice I saw in this article was not to buy more home than you need.  You don’t need a huge house for 2-4 people.  You can only be in so many rooms at once.  I would also like to point out that my home is an investment.  I bought a two-family home in a thriving rental market and live in the top unit.  The bottom unit produces $730 (more than $100 below market, as a favor) per month in income each month.  Our unit, if we chose to leave at some point, could produce about $950 per month in rental income.  In my opinion, that’s an investment.  Otherwise, I agree with the premise that the home you live in isn’t an investment.

Top 7 Recession Indicators @ The Huffington Post – If you’ve never read The Huffington Post, where have you been?  It’s one of the biggest political blogs on the web, and thousands of household names have written guest posts there.  It was also one of Time’s Best Blogs of 2009.  It has a liberal slant on the issues.  If that bothers you, it may not be for you.  Check out their readers’ cleverly compiled recession ending indicators either way.

How Outlet Malls Fool Shoppers @ The Consumerist – One of my favorite publications is Consumer Reports.  I rarely make a purchase without consulting with the online version of their magazine.  The Consumerist is a free resource owned by Consumer Reports that serves as sort of a consumer watchdog.  If a company is ripping someone off, The Consumerist makes sure that people know about it.  This is just a random sample – but did you know that companies intentionally make poorer products to sell at their outlet malls (which are also strategically placed in order to maximize your spending).  Check out this article.

Thinking of Starting Your Own Thing?  Here’s Why I failed @ Brazen Careerist – Caitlin McCabe tells us why she feels her initial attempt at starting her own business failed.  It’s an excellent article.  This is part of the reason I’ve started doing the entrepreneur interviews here – you can’t replace the experience of doing something.

In Defense of the Oracle of Omaha @ Seeking Alpha – For whatever reason, people certain people in the media like to go after Buffett.  I can’t tell you how many articles I’ve read saying his investing style is dead, or that he’s washed up, that he’s lost his touch, etc. etc. etc.  I can’t really understand why – he’s a real sweetheart.  I read Roger Lowenstein’s biography (one of my favorite books I have ever read) – and this didn’t just start.  This has been going on his entire career.  There’s a certain segment of the population that wants to seem him fail.  Now that he’s back on the way up, people are rushing to his defense.  Some of us never left.

Next week’s 5 Things You should Read will be posted on a Friday.  Have a great week and thanks for reading.

Share This Post
  • Share/Bookmark

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments



SetPageWidth